TY - JOUR
T1 - Profiles of Emotional Feedback and Their Effect on Principal's Attributed Charisma and Leader–Member Exchange Quality (LMX)
AU - Berkovich, Izhak
AU - Eyal, Ori
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, De La Salle University.
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - The present research explored the effect of different profiles of emotional feedback in principal-teacher relations on followers' perceptions of the leader (attributed charisma and leader–member exchange (LMX)). The study is based on a field survey of 645 teachers. The findings indicate four profiles of emotional feedback from principal, as experienced by teachers: profile 1—positive emphasis: high positive emotional manipulations (PEM) and low negative emotional manipulations (NEM); profile 2—mixed feedback: high PEM and high NEM; profile 3—non-manipulative: low PEM and low NEM; and profile 4—negative emphasis: high NEM and low PEM. In general, profile 1 (positive emphasis) resulted in higher attributed charisma and higher LMX quality, followed by profile 2 (mixed), profile 3 (non-manipulative), and profile 4 (negative emphasis). The study showed that as long as there is a positive feedback, even if it is accompanied by a negative one, the followers' perceptions of the leader are positive. Negative feedback was less associated with positive followers' perceptions of the leader than was low emotional feedback (i.e., non-manipulative).
AB - The present research explored the effect of different profiles of emotional feedback in principal-teacher relations on followers' perceptions of the leader (attributed charisma and leader–member exchange (LMX)). The study is based on a field survey of 645 teachers. The findings indicate four profiles of emotional feedback from principal, as experienced by teachers: profile 1—positive emphasis: high positive emotional manipulations (PEM) and low negative emotional manipulations (NEM); profile 2—mixed feedback: high PEM and high NEM; profile 3—non-manipulative: low PEM and low NEM; and profile 4—negative emphasis: high NEM and low PEM. In general, profile 1 (positive emphasis) resulted in higher attributed charisma and higher LMX quality, followed by profile 2 (mixed), profile 3 (non-manipulative), and profile 4 (negative emphasis). The study showed that as long as there is a positive feedback, even if it is accompanied by a negative one, the followers' perceptions of the leader are positive. Negative feedback was less associated with positive followers' perceptions of the leader than was low emotional feedback (i.e., non-manipulative).
KW - Emotional feedback
KW - Emotional manipulation
KW - Managerial feedback
KW - Principal
KW - Teacher
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100835422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40299-021-00552-2
DO - 10.1007/s40299-021-00552-2
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85100835422
SN - 0119-5646
VL - 30
SP - 349
EP - 359
JO - Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
JF - Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
IS - 4
ER -