Fairness Vs. Economic Efficiency: Lessons from an Interdisciplinary Analysis of Talmudic Bankruptcy Law

Itay Lipschütz, Mordechai E. Schwarz

פרסום מחקרי: פרסום בכתב עתסקירהביקורת עמיתים

תקציר

Bankruptcy problems are commonly associated with economic disasters, but can also emerge due to extraordinary economic performance The choice of a sharing rule has a significant potential effect on the economy's general equilibrium. The economic literature hitherto neglected the search for an economically optimal bankruptcy solution and concentrated mainly on normative axiomatizations of sharing rules. However, its findings did not attract much attention of legal scholars. The purpose of this article is to create a symposium between the economic and legal literature on bankruptcy based on our interdisciplinary analysis of a fascinating polemic conducted by Jewish Law scholars over the course of fifteenth centuries about the appropriate bankruptcy solution.

שפה מקוריתאנגלית
עמודים (מ-עד)45-57
מספר עמודים13
כתב עתReview of Law and Economics
כרך16
מספר גיליון3
מזהי עצם דיגיטלי (DOIs)
סטטוס פרסוםפורסם - 1 נוב׳ 2020

הערה ביבליוגרפית

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston 2020.

טביעת אצבע

להלן מוצגים תחומי המחקר של הפרסום 'Fairness Vs. Economic Efficiency: Lessons from an Interdisciplinary Analysis of Talmudic Bankruptcy Law'. יחד הם יוצרים טביעת אצבע ייחודית.

פורמט ציטוט ביבליוגרפי