TY - JOUR
T1 - A fast network-decomposition algorithm and its applications to constant-time distributed computation
AU - Barenboim, Leonid
AU - Elkin, Michael
AU - Gavoille, Cyril
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/12/3
Y1 - 2018/12/3
N2 - A partition (C1,C2,…,Cq) of G=(V,E) into clusters of strong (respectively, weak) diameter d, such that the supergraph obtained by contracting each Ci is ℓ-colorable is called a strong (resp., weak) (d,ℓ)-network-decomposition. Network-decompositions were introduced in a seminal paper by Awerbuch, Goldberg, Luby and Plotkin in 1989. Awerbuch et al. showed that strong (d,ℓ)-network-decompositions with d=ℓ=exp{O(lognloglogn)} can be computed in distributed deterministic time O(d). Even more importantly, they demonstrated that network-decompositions can be used for a great variety of applications in the message-passing model of distributed computing. The result of Awerbuch et al. was improved by Panconesi and Srinivasan in 1992: in the latter result d=ℓ=exp{O(logn)}, and the running time is O(d) as well. In another remarkable breakthrough Linial and Saks (in 1992) showed that weak (O(logn),O(logn))-network-decompositions can be computed in distributed randomized time O(log2n). Much more recently Barenboim (2012) devised a distributed randomized constant-time algorithm for computing strong network decompositions with d=O(1). However, the parameter ℓ in his result is O(n1/2+ϵ). In this paper we drastically improve the result of Barenboim and devise a distributed randomized constant-time algorithm for computing strong (O(1),O(nϵ))-network-decompositions. As a corollary we derive a constant-time randomized O(nϵ)-approximation algorithm for the distributed minimum coloring problem, improving the previously best-known O(n1/2+ϵ) approximation guarantee. We also derive other improved distributed algorithms for a variety of problems. Most notably, for the extremely well-studied distributed minimum dominating set problem currently there is no known deterministic polylogarithmic-time algorithm. We devise a deterministic polylogarithmic-time approximation algorithm for this problem, addressing an open problem of Lenzen and Wattenhofer (2010).
AB - A partition (C1,C2,…,Cq) of G=(V,E) into clusters of strong (respectively, weak) diameter d, such that the supergraph obtained by contracting each Ci is ℓ-colorable is called a strong (resp., weak) (d,ℓ)-network-decomposition. Network-decompositions were introduced in a seminal paper by Awerbuch, Goldberg, Luby and Plotkin in 1989. Awerbuch et al. showed that strong (d,ℓ)-network-decompositions with d=ℓ=exp{O(lognloglogn)} can be computed in distributed deterministic time O(d). Even more importantly, they demonstrated that network-decompositions can be used for a great variety of applications in the message-passing model of distributed computing. The result of Awerbuch et al. was improved by Panconesi and Srinivasan in 1992: in the latter result d=ℓ=exp{O(logn)}, and the running time is O(d) as well. In another remarkable breakthrough Linial and Saks (in 1992) showed that weak (O(logn),O(logn))-network-decompositions can be computed in distributed randomized time O(log2n). Much more recently Barenboim (2012) devised a distributed randomized constant-time algorithm for computing strong network decompositions with d=O(1). However, the parameter ℓ in his result is O(n1/2+ϵ). In this paper we drastically improve the result of Barenboim and devise a distributed randomized constant-time algorithm for computing strong (O(1),O(nϵ))-network-decompositions. As a corollary we derive a constant-time randomized O(nϵ)-approximation algorithm for the distributed minimum coloring problem, improving the previously best-known O(n1/2+ϵ) approximation guarantee. We also derive other improved distributed algorithms for a variety of problems. Most notably, for the extremely well-studied distributed minimum dominating set problem currently there is no known deterministic polylogarithmic-time algorithm. We devise a deterministic polylogarithmic-time approximation algorithm for this problem, addressing an open problem of Lenzen and Wattenhofer (2010).
KW - Coloring
KW - Distributed algorithms
KW - Dominating sets
KW - Local algorithms
KW - Spanners
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032330994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tcs.2016.07.005
DO - 10.1016/j.tcs.2016.07.005
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85032330994
SN - 0304-3975
VL - 751
SP - 2
EP - 23
JO - Theoretical Computer Science
JF - Theoretical Computer Science
ER -