Word retrieval in connected speech in Alzheimer’s disease: a review with meta-analyses

Gitit Kavé, Mira Goral

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Language assessment in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) demonstrates deficits in single-word production, but rarely includes connected speech. Aims: If Alzheimer’s disease leads to deficits in lexical retrieval, we should find reduced word output in connected speech, limited lexical diversity, an increase in retrieval errors, and an association between scores on tests of single-word production and measures of word retrieval in context. The purpose of this review was to investigate these hypotheses across studies of connected speech in AD. Main Contribution: A search of Medline and PsychNET identified 51 articles (published in 1985–2016) that reported data from 1,114 individuals with AD and 1,280 cognitively healthy individuals. A meta-analysis showed a significant but small reduction in word output in AD. No consistent decrease in the proportion of unique words was documented, but there was indication that individuals with AD produce more frequent words than do controls. An analysis of errors documented a moderate effect size, showing that individuals with AD commit more retrieval errors of all types. A relatively strong association was found between picture-naming scores and measures of word retrieval in connected speech. Conclusions: The review shows that individuals with AD experience significant lexical retrieval difficulties in connected speech.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-26
Number of pages23
JournalAphasiology
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Jan 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Narrative
  • discourse
  • lexical retrieval
  • spontaneous speech
  • word finding

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Word retrieval in connected speech in Alzheimer’s disease: a review with meta-analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this