TY - JOUR
T1 - Trial by polygraph
T2 - Scientific and juridical issues in lie detection
AU - Ben‐Shakhar, Gershon
AU - Bar‐Hillel, Maya
AU - Lieblich, Israel
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1986
Y1 - 1986
N2 - The present article examines two methods of polygraph‐assisted lie detection: the Control Question Technique (CQT) and the Guilty Knowledge Technique (GKT). It presents the rationale for both, arguing that only the latter is well grounded in psychological theory. It then surveys the empirical support for claims of the polygraph's ability to detect deception, arguing that such support often comes from studies that are methodologically flawed by contamination of various sorts—especially studies of the CQT. The article then explores the legal implications of introducing polygraph test results, as presently gathered, into the criminal courtroom.
AB - The present article examines two methods of polygraph‐assisted lie detection: the Control Question Technique (CQT) and the Guilty Knowledge Technique (GKT). It presents the rationale for both, arguing that only the latter is well grounded in psychological theory. It then surveys the empirical support for claims of the polygraph's ability to detect deception, arguing that such support often comes from studies that are methodologically flawed by contamination of various sorts—especially studies of the CQT. The article then explores the legal implications of introducing polygraph test results, as presently gathered, into the criminal courtroom.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023019689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/bsl.2370040408
DO - 10.1002/bsl.2370040408
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0023019689
SN - 0735-3936
VL - 4
SP - 459
EP - 479
JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law
JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law
IS - 4
ER -