TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effect of Common Versus Distinctive Stimulus Features on Electrodermal Orientation to Significant Stimuli
AU - Ben‐Shakhar, Gershon
AU - Gati, Itamar
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1992/5
Y1 - 1992/5
N2 - The relationship between electrodermal responsivity and stimulus similarity was previously demonstrated in a series of studies. These studies were guided by a feature‐matching model according to which similarity is an additive function of the common and distinctive features of the stimuli. In these experiments common and distinctive features were simultaneously manipulated, thus confounding the effects of the two sets of features. In the present experiment, we examined the separate effects of these two sets of features by an independent manipulation of common and distinctive components of the stimuli. A modified version of the guilty knowledge technique was employed, with compound pictorial and verbal stimuli (schematic faces and verbal descriptions of people) as the relevant items memorized by the subjects. Skin conductance responses were measured during the subsequent presentation of a stimulus sequence comprised of a test stimulus, which shared some common components with the relevant stimulus, and several neutral control stimuli. As hypothesized, a larger number of distinctive components resulted in decreased responsivity. Yet, contrary to our expectation, the number of common components of the relevant and test stimuli had no effect on responsivity. Several hypotheses are suggested to account for this unexpected result.
AB - The relationship between electrodermal responsivity and stimulus similarity was previously demonstrated in a series of studies. These studies were guided by a feature‐matching model according to which similarity is an additive function of the common and distinctive features of the stimuli. In these experiments common and distinctive features were simultaneously manipulated, thus confounding the effects of the two sets of features. In the present experiment, we examined the separate effects of these two sets of features by an independent manipulation of common and distinctive components of the stimuli. A modified version of the guilty knowledge technique was employed, with compound pictorial and verbal stimuli (schematic faces and verbal descriptions of people) as the relevant items memorized by the subjects. Skin conductance responses were measured during the subsequent presentation of a stimulus sequence comprised of a test stimulus, which shared some common components with the relevant stimulus, and several neutral control stimuli. As hypothesized, a larger number of distinctive components resulted in decreased responsivity. Yet, contrary to our expectation, the number of common components of the relevant and test stimuli had no effect on responsivity. Several hypotheses are suggested to account for this unexpected result.
KW - Common and distinctive features
KW - Contrast model
KW - Electrodermal responsivity
KW - Guilty knowledge technique
KW - Orienting response
KW - Significant stimuli
KW - Skin conductance response
KW - Stimulus generalization
KW - Stimulus similarity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026752367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1992.tb01704.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1992.tb01704.x
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 1626041
AN - SCOPUS:0026752367
SN - 0048-5772
VL - 29
SP - 306
EP - 314
JO - Psychophysiology
JF - Psychophysiology
IS - 3
ER -