Territorial governance in West Asia and North Africa: grey territorial governance in the West Bank

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

"Grey Territorial Governance" is proposed as an analytical and descriptive framework for the spatial-legal functions of institutions aiming to realise territorial logic of power, i.e. the collective, substantial, and imagined geopolitical interests. Grey governance, the conjunction of "territorial governance" and "grey speciality", is relevant to diverse configurations of control and power, particularly supportive of settler-colonialism, as well as in the West Asia and North Africa (WANA) region, where past colonial rule has left its footprints in contemporary territorial governance. The colonial logic of spatial control demands flexibility, dynamism, interpretability, and adaptability, thus serving as a "zone of comfort" for practising grey governance - obtained through fuzzy and flexible formal and informal geopolitical practices/technologies that replace legal planning procedures and property rights. The chapter conceptualises grey governance through two cases of informality and displacement in the occupied Palestinian Territories: an informal Jewish settlement, Amona, and the Bedouin-Palestinian community, Khan al-Ahmar.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Territorial Governance
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Pages494-507
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781035317288
ISBN (Print)9781035317271
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Editors and Contributors Severally 2025.

Keywords

  • Displaceability
  • Displacement
  • Grey territorial governance
  • Informality
  • West Asia and North Africa (WANA)
  • West Bank

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Territorial governance in West Asia and North Africa: grey territorial governance in the West Bank'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this