Supercrips versus the pitiful handicapped: Reception of disabling images by disabled audience members

Amit Kama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Thirty Israeli disabled people were asked to describe their most memorable interactions with mass mediated images of disability as part of a tentative endeavor to delve into their reception patterns. Two stereotypes are discussed in this paper, namely the sttpercrip and the pitiful disabled. The interviewees seek examples to corroborate their belief that physical, social, and cultural obstacles can be overcome. Highly regarded supercrips embody one example as 'regular' (i.e., 'someone like me') people are especially coveted. Well-known, successful disabled people are put on a pedestal for their demonstrated ability to triumph. This triumph is used to validate the disabled individual and to alter societal perceptions. Consequently, the wish to see disabled who 'have done it' is particularly intense while the pitiful disabled trigger antipathy because they reproduce and reinforce disabled people's inferior positionality and exclusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)447-466
Number of pages20
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2004

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Research was funded by the Open University of Israel Fund. I am thankful to Ms. Gila Haimovic for her linguistic assistance. A shorter version of this paper was presented at the Disability Studies: Theory, Policy and Practice Conference, Lancaster, UK, September 6, 2003.

Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.


  • Disabled audience members
  • Disabling images
  • Supercrip


Dive into the research topics of 'Supercrips versus the pitiful handicapped: Reception of disabling images by disabled audience members'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this