Abstract
Meyer suggests that gazing at images of the desirable female body portrayed in illuminated manuscripts might have invoked an amalgam of sexual desire and fears of emasculation in a presumed, otherwise unknown male readership, resulting in a mixed emotional response—pleasure coupled with shame and fear. This emotionally distressing experience, in its turn, probably entailed a feeling of anger, which led to a gendered ‘barbarism’—erasure, rubbing, and scrapping—that defaced the images in question. She suggests that these erasures reflect ingrained societal Byzantine notions that associated women with a disruptive and unsettling erotic power that was a threat to manliness and the consequential need to maintain the gender-hierarchical order.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | New Approaches to Byzantine History and Culture |
Publisher | Springer Nature |
Pages | 245-279 |
Number of pages | 35 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2019 |
Publication series
Name | New Approaches to Byzantine History and Culture |
---|---|
ISSN (Print) | 2730-9363 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 2730-9371 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019, The Author(s).
Keywords
- Damnatio Memoriae
- Hierarchical Gender Order
- John Chrysostom
- Photios
- hairHair