Stimulus novelty and significance in electrodermal orienting responses: The effects of adding versus deleting stimulus components

Itamar Gati, Gershon Ben-Shakhar, Sharon Avni-Liberty

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Several aspects of a feature-matching theory formulated to account for the roles of stimulus novelty and significance in determining orienting responses (ORs) were examined. Stimulus significance and stimulus novelty were independently manipulated, and the electrodermal component of the OR was measured while sequences of compound pictorial or verbal stimuli were presented. Each sequence included a test stimulus, which was either significant or neutral, and was preceded by several standard control stimuli. Novelty was manipulated by either adding or deleting components from the standard stimuli, and significance was defined within the framework of the guilty knowledge paradigm. A change in the number of components of both verbal and pictorial test stimuli affected OR magnitude for significant but not for neutral test stimuli. Similar ORs were obtained regardless of the direction of stimulus change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)637-643
Number of pages7
JournalPsychophysiology
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1996
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Feature-matching theory
  • Guilty knowledge technique
  • Orienting response
  • Skin conductance response
  • Stimulus novelty
  • Stimulus significance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stimulus novelty and significance in electrodermal orienting responses: The effects of adding versus deleting stimulus components'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this