Abstract
The attribution of sentience or consciousness to plants is currently a topic of debate among biologists and philosophers. The claim that plants are conscious is based on three arguments: (i) plants, like all living organisms, are sentient (biopsychism); (ii) there is a strong analogy between the phloem transport system of plants and the nervous system of animals; and (iii) plants are the cognitive equals of sentient animals. On the basis of a model of consciousness that spells out criteria for assigning sentience to a living organism and presents a diagnostic evolutionary marker of consciousness, we argue that these arguments are flawed and discuss some of the ethical issues they raise.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 17-33 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Consciousness Studies |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
State | Published - 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:©(c)ImprintAcademic For personal use only—not for reproduction.
Keywords
- Biopsychism
- Electrical signalling
- UAL model