Reflections on leadership preparation programs and social justice: Are the power and the responsibility of the faculty all in the design?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Fundamental aspects of educational leadership preparation programs regarding social justice are embodied in program design elements, yet the scholarly community did not adequately address these issues. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: The essay suggests that organizational theories dealing with person-environment fit can shed light on the models, possibilities, and limitations of various preparation programs. Findings: The essay proposes a meta-conceptual framework that builds on Schneider’s attraction-selection-attrition theory and on the socialization literature to classify leadership preparation programs by design. In addition, the paper reflects on the implications of program design in relation to the power and the responsibility of the faculty. Originality/value: The essay argues that design decisions made by the faculty a priori enable and constrain its power and responsibility. The conclusion is that design decisions should be made by faculty with awareness of these issues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-279
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Educational Administration
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © Emerald Publishing Limited.

Keywords

  • Leadership preparation
  • Moral leadership
  • Social activism
  • Social change
  • Social justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reflections on leadership preparation programs and social justice: Are the power and the responsibility of the faculty all in the design?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this