Abstract
I address the recent debate between Alexander Meehan and Lev Vaidman concerning the claim made by the former for a new problem to quantum mechanics. I argue that while Meehan’s incompatibility claim does hold in the situation he presents, it does not genuinely involve con-siderations that can limit quantum state preparation, nor does it introduce new constrains over possible interpretations of quantum theory.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 687-694 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | British Journal for the Philosophy of Science |
Volume | 75 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2024 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved.