Gender differences in the stability of trust and risk-taking

Doron Sonsino, Max Shifrin, Eyal Lahav

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The individual willingness to trust is compared to the inclination to take lottery risk in six distinct scenarios, controlling the return distributions. Trust responds to changes in the admissible return levels, but exhibits significantly smaller responsiveness to return expectations compared to parallel risk-taking. Paired comparisons suggest that the investors sacrifice 5% of the expected payoff to trust anonymous responders. Trust is more calculated and volatile for males, while appearing relatively stable for females. The results connect with evidence regarding physiological differences between trust and risk-taking, and in addition suggest that trust is more of a distinctive trait for females compared to males. The paper broadly discusses the results and their implications, connecting to diverse streams in the trust literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-251
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Trust Research
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Peter Ping Li.


  • Trust
  • gender
  • risk


Dive into the research topics of 'Gender differences in the stability of trust and risk-taking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this