Fairness Vs. Economic Efficiency: Lessons from an Interdisciplinary Analysis of Talmudic Bankruptcy Law

Itay Lipschütz, Mordechai E. Schwarz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Bankruptcy problems are commonly associated with economic disasters, but can also emerge due to extraordinary economic performance The choice of a sharing rule has a significant potential effect on the economy's general equilibrium. The economic literature hitherto neglected the search for an economically optimal bankruptcy solution and concentrated mainly on normative axiomatizations of sharing rules. However, its findings did not attract much attention of legal scholars. The purpose of this article is to create a symposium between the economic and legal literature on bankruptcy based on our interdisciplinary analysis of a fascinating polemic conducted by Jewish Law scholars over the course of fifteenth centuries about the appropriate bankruptcy solution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-57
Number of pages13
JournalReview of Law and Economics
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston 2020.

Keywords

  • bankruptcy
  • economic approach
  • fairness approach
  • priority
  • sharing rules

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fairness Vs. Economic Efficiency: Lessons from an Interdisciplinary Analysis of Talmudic Bankruptcy Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this