Distributed universality

Michel Raynal, Julien Stainer, Gadi Taubenfeld

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

This paper significantly extends the universality results introduced by Herlihy and Gafni-Guerraoui. In particular, we present a k-universal construction which satisfies the following five desired properties, which are not satisfied by the previous k-universal construction: (1) among the k objects that are constructed, at least ℓ objects (and not just one) are guaranteed to progress forever; (2) the progress condition for processes is wait-freedom, which means that each correct process executes an infinite number of operations on each object that progresses forever; (3) if any of the k constructed objects stops progressing, all its copies (one at each process) stop in the same state; (4) the proposed construction is contention-aware, in the sense that it uses only read/write registers in the absence of contention; and (5) it is generous with respect to the obstruction-freedom progress condition, which means that each process is able to complete any one of its pending operations on the k objects if all the other processes hold still long enough. The proposed construction, which is based on new design principles, is called a (k, ℓ)- universal construction. It uses a natural extension of k-simultaneous consensus objects, called (k, ℓ)-simultaneous consensus objects ((k, ℓ)-SC). Together with atomic registers, (k, ℓ)-SC objects are shown to be necessary and sufficient for building a (k, ℓ)-universal construction, and, in that sense, (k, ℓ)-SC objects are (k, ℓ)-universal.

A notion of a universal construction suited to distributed computing has been introduced by M. Herlihy in his celebrated paper “Wait-free synchronization” (ACM TOPLAS, 1991). A universal construction is an algorithm that can be used to wait-free implement any object defined by a sequential specification. Herlihy’s paper shows that the basic system model, which supports only atomic read/write registers, has to be enriched with consensus objects to allow the design of universal constructions. The generalized notion of a k-universal construction has been recently introduced by Gafni and Guerraoui (CONCUR, 2011). A k-universal construction is an algorithm that can be used to simultaneously implement k objects (instead of just one object), with the guarantee that at least one of the k constructed objects progresses forever. While Herlihy’s universal construction relies on atomic registers and consensus objects, a k-universal construction relies on atomic registers and k-simultaneous consensus objects (which are wait-free equivalent to k-set agreement objects in the read/write system model).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPrinciples of Distributed Systems - 18th International Conference, OPODIS 2014, Proceedings
EditorsMarcos K. Aguilera, Leonardo Querzoni, Marc Shapiro
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages469-484
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9783319144719
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes
Event18th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems, OPODIS 2014 - Cortina d’Ampezzo, Italy
Duration: 16 Dec 201419 Dec 2014

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume8878
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference18th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems, OPODIS 2014
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityCortina d’Ampezzo
Period16/12/1419/12/14

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014.

Keywords

  • Asynchronous read/write system
  • Consensus
  • Contention-awareness
  • Crash failures
  • Distributed computability
  • Non-blocking
  • Obstruction-freedom
  • State machine replication
  • Universal construction
  • Wait-freedom
  • k-simultaneous consensus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Distributed universality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this