TY - JOUR
T1 - Determinants of judgment and decision making quality
T2 - the interplay between information processing style and situational factors
AU - Ayal, Shahar
AU - Rusou, Zohar
AU - Zakay, Dan
AU - Hochman, Guy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 Ayal, Rusou, Zakay and Hochman.
PY - 2015/7/30
Y1 - 2015/7/30
N2 - A framework is presented to better characterize the role of individual differences in information processing style and their interplay with contextual factors in determining decision making quality. In Experiment 1, we show that individual differences in information processing style are flexible and can be modified by situational factors. Specifically, a situational manipulation that induced an analytical mode of thought improved decision quality. In Experiment 2, we show that this improvement in decision quality is highly contingent on the compatibility between the dominant thinking mode and the nature of the task. That is, encouraging an intuitive mode of thought led to better performance on an intuitive task but hampered performance on an analytical task. The reverse pattern was obtained when an analytical mode of thought was encouraged. We discuss the implications of these results for the assessment of decision making competence, and suggest practical directions to help individuals better adjust their information processing style to the situation at hand and make optimal decisions.
AB - A framework is presented to better characterize the role of individual differences in information processing style and their interplay with contextual factors in determining decision making quality. In Experiment 1, we show that individual differences in information processing style are flexible and can be modified by situational factors. Specifically, a situational manipulation that induced an analytical mode of thought improved decision quality. In Experiment 2, we show that this improvement in decision quality is highly contingent on the compatibility between the dominant thinking mode and the nature of the task. That is, encouraging an intuitive mode of thought led to better performance on an intuitive task but hampered performance on an analytical task. The reverse pattern was obtained when an analytical mode of thought was encouraged. We discuss the implications of these results for the assessment of decision making competence, and suggest practical directions to help individuals better adjust their information processing style to the situation at hand and make optimal decisions.
KW - biases
KW - decision making competence
KW - dual-process theory
KW - individual differences
KW - information processing style
KW - intuitive
KW - rational
KW - transitivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991626453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01088
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01088
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 26284011
AN - SCOPUS:84991626453
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 6
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 1088
ER -