Committee assignment patterns in fragmented multiparty settings: Party personnel practices and coalition management

Reut Itzkovitch-Malka, Matthew S. Shugart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper addresses the way parties assign members to parliamentary committees in fragmented multiparty settings. Thus, it analyzes how the two most central institutions of parliamentary politics––political parties and parliamentary committees––interact with one another. To the best of our knowledge, no research into this subject has systematically explored the intersection of considerations based on individual legislator characteristics and coalition management in committee assignment. Using Israel as our case study, we show that legislators' expertise modestly shapes committee assignment patterns. However, parties in coalition often have another set of considerations to take into account when assigning members to committees. We show that parties in coalition do not only bargain on ministerial positions or committee chairs––they also bargain on their members’ assignment to committees and use this resource to allow (or hinder) each other to augment influence and control in a given policy area, or to perform affective monitoring.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1001-1012
Number of pages12
JournalParty Politics
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.

Keywords

  • Israel
  • coalition monitoring
  • legislative committees
  • party personnel theory
  • portfolio allocation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Committee assignment patterns in fragmented multiparty settings: Party personnel practices and coalition management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this