Brief announcement: Distributed universality contention-awareness; wait-freedom; object progress, and other properties

Michel Raynal, Julien Stainer, Gadi Taubenfeld

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

A notion of a universal construction suited to distributed computing has been introduced by M. Herlihy in his celebrated paper "Wait-free synchronization" (ACM TOPLAS, 1991). A universal construction is an algorithm that can be used to wait-free implement any object defined by a sequential specification. Herlihy's paper shows that the basic system model, which supports only atomic read/write registers, has to be enriched with consensus objects to allow the design of universal constructions. The generalized notion of a k-universal construction has been recently introduced by Gafni and Guerraoui (CONCUR, 2011). A k-universal construction is an algorithm that can be used to simultaneously implement k objects (instead of just one object), with the guarantee that at least one of the k constructed objects progresses forever. While Herlihy's universal construction relies on atomic registers and consensus objects, a k-universal construction relies on atomic registers and ksimultaneous consensus objects (which have been shown to be computationally equivalent to k-set agreement objects in the read/write system model where any number of processes may crash). This paper significantly extends the universality results introduced by Herlihy and Gafni-Guerraoui. In particular, we present a k-universal construction which satisfies the following five desired properties, which are not satisfied by the previous k-universal construction: (1) among the k objects that are constructed, at least l objects (and not just one) are guaranteed to progress forever; (2) the progress condition for processes is wait-freedom, which means that each correct process executes an infinite number of operations on each object that progresses forever; (3) if one of the k constructed objects stops progressing, it stops in the same state at each process; (4) the proposed construction is contentionaware, which means that it uses only read/write registers in the absence of contention; and (5) it is indulgent with respect to the obstruction-freedom progress condition, which means that each process is able to complete any one of its pending operations on the k objects if all the other process hold still long enough. The proposed construction, which is based on new design principles, is called a (k, l)-universal construction. It uses a natural extension of k-simultaneous consensus objects, called (k, l)-simultaneous consensus objects ((k,l)-SC). Together with atomic registers, (k,l)-SC objects are shown to be necessary and sufficient for building a (k, l)-universal construction, in that sense, (k,l)-SC objects are (k,l)-universal.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPODC 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages206-208
Number of pages3
ISBN (Print)9781450329446
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes
Event2014 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC 2014 - Paris, France
Duration: 15 Jul 201418 Jul 2014

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing

Conference

Conference2014 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC 2014
Country/TerritoryFrance
CityParis
Period15/07/1418/07/14

Keywords

  • Asynchronous read/write system
  • Crash failures
  • K-set agreement
  • K-simultaneous consensus
  • Non-blocking
  • Obstruction-freedom
  • State machine replication
  • Universal construction
  • Wait-freedom

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brief announcement: Distributed universality contention-awareness; wait-freedom; object progress, and other properties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this