TY - JOUR
T1 - The pottery of tel esur, a rural canaanite late bronze age site on the via maris
AU - Shalvi, Golan
AU - Bar, Shay
AU - Shoval, Shlomo
AU - Gilboa, Ayelet
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Schools of Oriental Research. 0003-097X/2019/382-00X$10.00. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/11/1
Y1 - 2019/11/1
N2 - Tel Esur is identifiable with D-f-tj (Djefty), mentioned by Thutmose III in his description of his march to Megiddo through the ʿAruna Pass. Recent excavations provide the first unequivocal indication that the site was inhabited during the Late Bronze Age as a farm/hamlet, perhaps also a waystation. The main architectural feature is a large partially-excavated structure, whose contents—mainly pottery—were well preserved by a destruction level. We propose that the destruction assemblage dates around the mid-14th century b.c.e. and that the structure was built around 1400 b.c.e., thus somewhat later than Thutmose III’s famed first campaign. Since pottery of this period is known primarily from large/central sites, Tel Esur offers an exceptional glimpse into a 14th century b.c.e. assemblage from the rural Canaanite domain. Currently, it is also the only small site excavated along the ʿAruna Pass between Megiddo and the Sharon, inter alia offering insights about this stretch of the Via Maris during the Late Bronze Age. This is the first synthesis of Tel Esur during this period. We focus on typo-chronology, and on the main characteristics of the ceramic assemblage, including unique phenomena such as storage in Cypriot-Style pithoi and Egyptianizing pottery in a rural setting.
AB - Tel Esur is identifiable with D-f-tj (Djefty), mentioned by Thutmose III in his description of his march to Megiddo through the ʿAruna Pass. Recent excavations provide the first unequivocal indication that the site was inhabited during the Late Bronze Age as a farm/hamlet, perhaps also a waystation. The main architectural feature is a large partially-excavated structure, whose contents—mainly pottery—were well preserved by a destruction level. We propose that the destruction assemblage dates around the mid-14th century b.c.e. and that the structure was built around 1400 b.c.e., thus somewhat later than Thutmose III’s famed first campaign. Since pottery of this period is known primarily from large/central sites, Tel Esur offers an exceptional glimpse into a 14th century b.c.e. assemblage from the rural Canaanite domain. Currently, it is also the only small site excavated along the ʿAruna Pass between Megiddo and the Sharon, inter alia offering insights about this stretch of the Via Maris during the Late Bronze Age. This is the first synthesis of Tel Esur during this period. We focus on typo-chronology, and on the main characteristics of the ceramic assemblage, including unique phenomena such as storage in Cypriot-Style pithoi and Egyptianizing pottery in a rural setting.
KW - Canaanite Late Bronze Age
KW - Canaanite regional pottery
KW - Cypriot-style pithoi
KW - Egyptianizing pottery
KW - Tel Esur
KW - Via Maris
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075667378&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/705733.
DO - 10.1086/705733.
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85075667378
SN - 0003-097X
VL - 382
SP - 111
EP - 142
JO - Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research
JF - Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research
IS - 1
ER -