ملخص
Haim Bouzaglo's Fictitious Marriage (1988) and Judd Ne'eman's Streets of Yesterday (1989) were made during a time when the violent events of the first Palestinian uprising (Intifada) had engendered a heightened sense of mistrust in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories.1 These two films compel us to reexamine the core aspects of the Hebraic Israeli identity in relation to the Palestinian Other by using one specific device-the impersonation of a Palestinian by an Israeli character, played by a Jewish actor. Dorit Naaman maintains that Fictitious Marriage reinforces and reaffirms ethnic boundaries, that the "passing⋯ affirms existing⋯ hierarchical social structures" and therefore that the film is not subversive.2 I argue, however, that it is precisely the failure to escape the dominant ideology and stereotypes that renders Fictitious Marriage subversive and that the failure to contend with the Palestinian Other is conflated in both films with the repudiation of the Exilic Jew.
| اللغة الأصلية | الإنجليزيّة |
|---|---|
| عنوان منشور المضيف | Israeli Cinema |
| العنوان الفرعي لمنشور المضيف | Identities in Motion |
| ناشر | University of Texas Press |
| الصفحات | 241-256 |
| عدد الصفحات | 16 |
| مستوى الصوت | 9780292735606 |
| رقم المعيار الدولي للكتب (الإلكتروني) | 9780292735606 |
| رقم المعيار الدولي للكتب (المطبوع) | 9780292725607 |
| حالة النشر | نُشِر - 2011 |
ملاحظة ببليوغرافية
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © 2011 by the University of Texas Press.
RAMBI publications
- !!rambi
بصمة
أدرس بدقة موضوعات البحث “The foreigner within and the question of identity in "Fictitious Marriage" and "Streets of Yesterday"'. فهما يشكلان معًا بصمة فريدة.قم بذكر هذا
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver