Risk Aversion and the Gender Gap in the Vote for Populist Radical Right Parties

Odelia Oshri, Liran Harsgor, Reut Itzkovitch-Malka, Or Tuttnauer

نتاج البحث: نشر في مجلةمقالةمراجعة النظراء

ملخص

Previous research has established that men are more likely to vote for populist radical right parties (PRRPs) than women. This article shows how cross-national and temporal variations in PRRPs’ electoral success interact with individuals’ risk propensity to affect this gender gap. We hypothesize that gender differences in the electoral support of PRRPs stem from disparities in risk-taking. We conceptualize risk in terms of two components, social and electoral, and demonstrate that women are more risk-averse regarding both. Our analysis is based on public opinion data from 14 countries (2002–16) combined with macrolevel data on PRRPs’ past parliamentary fortunes. To distinguish between the social and electoral components in risk-taking, we use the illustrative case study of Germany. Findings demonstrate that gender differences in risk-taking and, by implication, the differences between women's and men's responses to the electoral context are key to understanding the voting gender gap.

اللغة الأصليةالإنجليزيّة
الصفحات (من إلى)701-717
عدد الصفحات17
دوريةAmerican Journal of Political Science
مستوى الصوت67
رقم الإصدار3
تاريخ مبكر على الإنترنت1 فبراير 2022
المعرِّفات الرقمية للأشياء
حالة النشرنَشْر مسبق في الإنترنت - 1 فبراير 2022

ملاحظة ببليوغرافية

Publisher Copyright:
©2022, Midwest Political Science Association.

بصمة

أدرس بدقة موضوعات البحث “Risk Aversion and the Gender Gap in the Vote for Populist Radical Right Parties'. فهما يشكلان معًا بصمة فريدة.

قم بذكر هذا