Perceiving intergroup conflict: From game models to mental templates

Nir Halevy, Lilach Sagiv, Sonia Roccas, Gary Bornstein

نتاج البحث: نشر في مجلةمقالةمراجعة النظراء

ملخص

This article puts forward a parsimonious framework for studying subjective perceptions of real-life intergroup conflicts. Four studies were conducted to explore how individuals perceive the strategic properties of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Studies 1 and 2 found theory-driven associations between people's subjective perception of the conflict's structure as a Chicken, Assurance, or Prisoner's Dilemma game and their ingroup/outgroup perceptions, national identification, religiosity, political partisanship, voting behavior, and right-wing authoritarianism. Studies 3 and 4 manipulated the saliency of the needs for cognitive closure and security, respectively, demonstrating that these needs affect people's endorsement of the game models as descriptions of the conflict.

اللغة الأصليةالإنجليزيّة
الصفحات (من إلى)1674-1689
عدد الصفحات16
دوريةPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
مستوى الصوت32
رقم الإصدار12
المعرِّفات الرقمية للأشياء
حالة النشرنُشِر - ديسمبر 2006

بصمة

أدرس بدقة موضوعات البحث “Perceiving intergroup conflict: From game models to mental templates'. فهما يشكلان معًا بصمة فريدة.

قم بذكر هذا