ملخص
John Rawls and Simone Weil presented two distinct conceptions of political justice, aimed at articulating a common ethos in an inherently heterogeneous society. The terms of the former, chiefly concerned with the distribution of primary goods, underwrite much of today's Western democracies political liberalism. The terms of the latter, chiefly concerned with the way interaction is organised in social activities in view of the body and soul's balancing pairs of needs, are less well known. We explain the sense in which the overlapping consensus in Weil's notion of political justice is “thicker”, and may thus deserve more attention – alongside that of Rawls – for substantiating a democratic ethos within political liberalism.
| اللغة الأصلية | الإنجليزيّة |
|---|---|
| الصفحات (من إلى) | 362-384 |
| عدد الصفحات | 23 |
| دورية | Philosophical Investigations |
| مستوى الصوت | 39 |
| رقم الإصدار | 4 |
| المعرِّفات الرقمية للأشياء | |
| حالة النشر | نُشِر - 1 أكتوبر 2016 |
ملاحظة ببليوغرافية
Publisher Copyright:© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
بصمة
أدرس بدقة موضوعات البحث “Overlapping Consensus Thin and Thick: John Rawls and Simone Weil'. فهما يشكلان معًا بصمة فريدة.قم بذكر هذا
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver