Fairness Vs. Economic Efficiency: Lessons from an Interdisciplinary Analysis of Talmudic Bankruptcy Law

Itay Lipschütz, Mordechai E. Schwarz

نتاج البحث: نشر في مجلةمقالة مرجعية مراجعة النظراء

ملخص

Bankruptcy problems are commonly associated with economic disasters, but can also emerge due to extraordinary economic performance The choice of a sharing rule has a significant potential effect on the economy's general equilibrium. The economic literature hitherto neglected the search for an economically optimal bankruptcy solution and concentrated mainly on normative axiomatizations of sharing rules. However, its findings did not attract much attention of legal scholars. The purpose of this article is to create a symposium between the economic and legal literature on bankruptcy based on our interdisciplinary analysis of a fascinating polemic conducted by Jewish Law scholars over the course of fifteenth centuries about the appropriate bankruptcy solution.

اللغة الأصليةالإنجليزيّة
الصفحات (من إلى)45-57
عدد الصفحات13
دوريةReview of Law and Economics
مستوى الصوت16
رقم الإصدار3
المعرِّفات الرقمية للأشياء
حالة النشرنُشِر - 1 نوفمبر 2020

ملاحظة ببليوغرافية

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston 2020.

بصمة

أدرس بدقة موضوعات البحث “Fairness Vs. Economic Efficiency: Lessons from an Interdisciplinary Analysis of Talmudic Bankruptcy Law'. فهما يشكلان معًا بصمة فريدة.

قم بذكر هذا