A comment on Farwell (2012): Brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials

Ewout H. Meijer; Gershon Ben-Shakhar; Bruno Verschuere; Emanuel Donchin

doi:10.1007/s11571-012-9217-x

A comment on Farwell (2012): Brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials

Ewout H. Meijer
, Gershon Ben-Shakhar
, Bruno Verschuere
, Emanuel Donchin

نتاج البحث: نشر في مجلة › مقالة › مراجعة النظراء

ملخص

In a recent issue of Cognitive Neurodynamics Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115-154, 2012) published a comprehensive tutorial review of the use of Event Related Brain Potentials (ERP) in the detection of concealed information. Farwell's review covered much of his own work employing his "brain fingerprinting" technology. All his work showed a 100 % accuracy rate in detecting concealed information. We argue in this comment that Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115-154, 2012) is misleading and misrepresents the scientific status of brain fingerprinting technology.

اللغة الأصلية	الإنجليزيّة
الصفحات (من إلى)	155-158
عدد الصفحات	4
دورية	Cognitive Neurodynamics
مستوى الصوت	7
رقم الإصدار	2
المعرِّفات الرقمية للأشياء	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-012-9217-x
حالة النشر	نُشِر - أبريل 2013
منشور خارجيًا	نعم

الوصول إلى المستند

10.1007/s11571-012-9217-x

الملفات والروابط الأخرى

Link to publication in Scopus

قم بذكر هذا

@article{8bb144dcfd6a4de0b8554f171ddf540f,

title = "A comment on Farwell (2012): Brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials",

abstract = "In a recent issue of Cognitive Neurodynamics Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115-154, 2012) published a comprehensive tutorial review of the use of Event Related Brain Potentials (ERP) in the detection of concealed information. Farwell's review covered much of his own work employing his {"}brain fingerprinting{"} technology. All his work showed a 100 \% accuracy rate in detecting concealed information. We argue in this comment that Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115-154, 2012) is misleading and misrepresents the scientific status of brain fingerprinting technology.",

keywords = "Brain fingerprinting, Concealed information test (CIT), Guilty knowledge test (GKT), P300",

author = "Meijer, \{Ewout H.\} and Gershon Ben-Shakhar and Bruno Verschuere and Emanuel Donchin",

year = "2013",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1007/s11571-012-9217-x",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "7",

pages = "155--158",

journal = "Cognitive Neurodynamics",

issn = "1871-4080",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",

number = "2",

}

A comment on Farwell (2012): Brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials. / Meijer, Ewout H.; Ben-Shakhar, Gershon; Verschuere, Bruno وآخرون.
في: Cognitive Neurodynamics, المجلد 7, رقم 2, 04.2013, صفحة 155-158.

نتاج البحث: نشر في مجلة › مقالة › مراجعة النظراء

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comment on Farwell (2012)

T2 - Brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials

AU - Meijer, Ewout H.

AU - Ben-Shakhar, Gershon

AU - Verschuere, Bruno

AU - Donchin, Emanuel

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - In a recent issue of Cognitive Neurodynamics Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115-154, 2012) published a comprehensive tutorial review of the use of Event Related Brain Potentials (ERP) in the detection of concealed information. Farwell's review covered much of his own work employing his "brain fingerprinting" technology. All his work showed a 100 % accuracy rate in detecting concealed information. We argue in this comment that Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115-154, 2012) is misleading and misrepresents the scientific status of brain fingerprinting technology.

AB - In a recent issue of Cognitive Neurodynamics Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115-154, 2012) published a comprehensive tutorial review of the use of Event Related Brain Potentials (ERP) in the detection of concealed information. Farwell's review covered much of his own work employing his "brain fingerprinting" technology. All his work showed a 100 % accuracy rate in detecting concealed information. We argue in this comment that Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115-154, 2012) is misleading and misrepresents the scientific status of brain fingerprinting technology.

KW - Brain fingerprinting

KW - Concealed information test (CIT)

KW - Guilty knowledge test (GKT)

KW - P300

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84902684732

U2 - 10.1007/s11571-012-9217-x

DO - 10.1007/s11571-012-9217-x

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

AN - SCOPUS:84902684732

SN - 1871-4080

VL - 7

SP - 155

EP - 158

JO - Cognitive Neurodynamics

JF - Cognitive Neurodynamics

IS - 2

ER -

A comment on Farwell (2012): Brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials

ملخص

الوصول إلى المستند

الملفات والروابط الأخرى

بصمة

قم بذكر هذا